Senaste kommentarer (RSS-flöde)
Följ mig på Twitter
Hittade detta skojiga YouTube-klipp:
I klippet refereras till Chesterton som klarsynt skrivit följande:
And the more the Darwinians explain, the more certain I become that Darwinism was wrong. All their explanations ignore the fact that Darwinism supposes an animal feature to appear first, not merely in an incomplete stage, but in an almost imperceptible stage. The member of a sort of mouse family, destined to found the bat family, could only have differed from his brother mice by some minute trace of membrane; and why should that enable him to escape out of a natural massacre of mice? Or even if we suppose it did serve some other purpose, it could only be by a coincidence; and this is to imagine a million coincidences accounting for every creature.
När du gillar honom för övrigt, hur kan du då vara så säker på att han hade fel i ovanstående?
Jag är inte säker.